Current:Home > BackSupreme Court takes on social media: First Amendment fight over 'censorship' is on the docket-InfoLens
Supreme Court takes on social media: First Amendment fight over 'censorship' is on the docket
View Date:2024-12-23 16:00:46
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide challenges to laws in Texas and Florida that would limit the ability of platforms like Facebook, YouTube and X to moderate content – entering into a deeply partisan fray that could change the way millions of Americans interact with social media during an election year.
The state laws at issue in the cases, both of which have been temporarily blocked by federal courts, severely limit the ability of social media companies to kick users off their platforms or remove individual posts − even if those posts spread a foreign government's misinformation or provide false medical advice. Trade groups representing the nation's social media companies say the state laws would "transform speech on the internet as we know it today."
“These cases could completely reshape the digital public sphere," said Jameel Jaffer, executive director at the Knight First Amendment Institute. "It's difficult to think of any other recent First Amendment cases in which the stakes were so high.”
But Republican lawmakers in Texas and Florida − including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is seeking the GOP presidential nomination − argue that social media companies have been too quick to throttle conservative viewpoints and too opaque in explaining how they decide what to remove. That argument reached a fever pitch in 2021, when Twitter and other major platforms suspended former President Donald Trump after the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
Trade groups representing the companies say the lawswould radically transform social media, making it impossible to cull foreign propaganda, harassment and misinformation. The First Amendment, they say, bars the government from compelling private entities – from newspapers to social networks – from publishing or not publishing content it favors.
“It is high time that the Supreme Court resolves whether governments can force websites to publish dangerous content," said Matt Schruers, president of the Computer & Communications Industry Association. "Telling private websites they must give equal treatment to extremist hate isn’t just unwise, it is unconstitutional, and we look forward to demonstrating that to the court.”
Ethics:Not just Clarence Thomas: Lower courts facing scrutiny over ethics, disclosures, too
But the dominant social networks have come under increasing scrutiny from some on the right and the left in recent years. Justice Clarence Thomas in 2021 compared Twitter, now known as X, and other large social media companies to communication utilities that could be regulated, asserting the concentration in the industry gives digital platforms "enormous control over speech." That interpretation, if it gains traction, could open the companies up to far greater government regulation.
Social media companies have generally denied their content moderation benefits liberals or conservatives. Elon Musk, who owns X, promoted a series of tweets last year that demonstrated how executives at the company struggled with handling posts about a report on Hunter Biden's laptop before the 2020 presidential election. Musk promoted the material in an effort to bolster claims of the political left's grip over Big Tech.
Musk's predecessor, Jack Dorsey, had acknowledged the controversy two years earlier and said the way the company handled the story was "wrong."
The cases put social media front and center on the high court's docket and will be among the closest watched this term. The court is already wrestling several other social media cases, including two that deal with whether elected officials may block voters from their social media accounts. A similar case involving Trump made its way up to the Supreme Court but was dismissed after he left office in 2021.
Decisions in the cases are expected next year.
At the the moment, neither the Florida nor the Texas law are in effect.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit blocked enforcement of most of Florida's law last year. But the New Orleans-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit backed the similar Texas law. That created a split in how appeals courts are interpreting the laws.
In May, a 5-4 majority of the Supreme Court blocked Texas from enforcing its law. The decision, on the court's emergency docket, was not accompanied by an opinion.
Impact:How the Supreme Court could alter the way Americans interact on the internet
Justice Samuel Alito, in a dissent joined by Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch in that emergency case, wrote that it is "not at all obvious how our existing precedents, which predate the age of the internet, should apply to large social media companies."
Contributing: Jessica Guynn
veryGood! (28968)
Related
- Deebo Samuel explains 'out of character' sideline altercation with 49ers long snapper, kicker
- Deion Sanders, bearded and rested after bye, weighs in on Michigan, 'Saturday Night Live'
- Flights delayed and canceled at Houston’s Hobby Airport after 2 private jets clip wings on airfield
- Iranian teen Armita Geravand has no hope of recovery after controversial train incident, her family says
- Timothée Chalamet Details How He Transformed Into Bob Dylan for Movie
- Relatives of victims of alleged war crimes in Myanmar seek justice against generals in Philippines
- Wisconsin wildlife officials to vote new on wolf management plan with no population goal
- Activists demand transparency over Malaysia’s move to extend Lynas Rare Earth’s operations
- NBA today: Injuries pile up, Mavericks are on a skid, Nuggets return to form
- North Carolina woman charged in death of assisted living resident pushed to floor, police say
Ranking
- 4 charged in Detroit street shooting that left 2 dead, 5 wounded
- Meet Ed Currie, the man behind the world's hottest chili pepper
- Sam Bankman-Fried will testify in his own defense, lawyers say
- Inside Israel's Palmachim Airbase as troops prepare for potential Gaza operations against Hamas
- Mattel says it ‘deeply’ regrets misprint on ‘Wicked’ dolls packaging that links to porn site
- Sam Bankman-Fried plans to testify at his New York fraud trial, his lawyer says
- Russia maneuvers carefully over the Israel-Hamas war as it seeks to expand its global clout
- Japan’s top court to rule on law that requires reproductive organ removal for official gender change
Recommendation
-
Jessica Simpson's Husband Eric Johnson Steps Out Ringless Amid Split Speculation
-
Mississippi should set minimum wage higher than federal level, says Democrat running for governor
-
Tom Emmer withdraws bid for House speaker hours after winning nomination, leaving new cycle of chaos
-
Bobi, the world's oldest dog, dies at 31
-
Full House Star Dave Coulier Shares Stage 3 Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Diagnosis
-
Travis Kelce Reacts to Coach Andy Reid Giving Taylor Swift the Ultimate Stamp of Approval
-
Is alcohol a depressant? Understand why it matters.
-
Hurricane Otis makes landfall in Mexico as Category 5 storm